Journey
0–10
Define the primary user flow, devices, accessibility needs, and performance target.
Evidence: A prioritized journey with measurable constraints.
Role preparation · Reviewed 2026-08-03
Who this is for
Frontend and full-stack engineers targeting senior roles where a system design round includes browser architecture, product trade-offs, and coordination with backend services.
Use the mock interview deliberately
Frontend system design is not a component-library recital. Begin with the user journey and interaction constraints, then decide what state belongs in the URL, server cache, client store, component tree, or durable local storage.
A strong answer makes slow networks, stale data, partial failure, accessibility, security, telemetry, and incremental rollout visible. The diagram should show browser boundaries and data flow, not just backend boxes behind an unnamed client.
Core capabilities
Identify critical tasks, latency expectations, device constraints, accessibility requirements, and ownership between routes or micro-frontends.
Separate server state, ephemeral UI state, form state, navigation state, and collaborative or offline state.
Set budgets for loading, rendering, memory, and interaction; handle retries, stale data, offline transitions, and degraded experiences.
Cover code splitting, caching, feature flags, client telemetry, error boundaries, experimentation, and rollback.
Timed session
0–10
Define the primary user flow, devices, accessibility needs, and performance target.
Evidence: A prioritized journey with measurable constraints.
10–28
Choose route, component, data-fetching, state, and API boundaries.
Evidence: A browser-aware data-flow diagram.
28–45
Address loading, optimistic updates, errors, offline behavior, security, and accessibility.
Evidence: Explicit user-visible states for slow and failed operations.
45–60
Explain performance measurement, flags, telemetry, testing, rollout, and rollback.
Evidence: A delivery plan tied to real-user metrics.
Live practice
The scenarios are independent practice. Open the public prompt first, then run it in the matching workspace with voice follow-ups and evidence-based review.
Hard · system design
Design a real-time collaborative document editor supporting multiple simultaneous users.
Hard · system design
Design a mapping service with route planning and ETA calculation.
Hard · system design
Design a global video streaming platform supporting millions of concurrent users.
Hard · system design
Design a real-time chat application like WhatsApp or Facebook Messenger.
Self-review scorecard
Strong signal: Optimizes a defined user journey and device context.
Warning signal: Draws framework components before understanding the task.
Strong signal: Places each state according to lifetime and source of truth.
Warning signal: Puts all state in one global store.
Strong signal: Uses budgets and measurement to guide choices.
Warning signal: Says lazy loading without identifying the critical path.
Strong signal: Designs intentional loading, stale, error, and retry states.
Warning signal: Assumes a fast and reliable network.
Frequently asked questions
Yes. It gives more weight to user journeys, browser constraints, state lifetimes, rendering, accessibility, network behavior, telemetry, and safe client delivery.
Choose one only after explaining the architectural requirement it serves. Interviewers care more about boundaries and trade-offs than a framework name.
Show routes or surfaces, component boundaries, state owners, data-fetching and caching layers, APIs, telemetry, and important browser or CDN behavior.